Chemistry Laboratory Classwork
Useful Stats
- Extinction Coefficient for HICA: 43430 M-1cm-1
- Molar Mass for HICA: 26249.96 Da
- A(280nm)=ɛ(HICA)bC(in M) (account for dilution)
- Mol/L to mg/mL
- Use desalting volume of protein recovered to find mg of pure protein
Excel Data Files (dated and signed)
- wt HICA Chromatograph Excel File: http://crystal-wiki.gonzaga.edu/tiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=148
- R160H HICA Chromatograph Excel File: http://crystal-wiki.gonzaga.edu/tiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=149
[[Konis&Blount 1/28/13]]
*wt ECCA Chromatograph Excel File: http://crystal-wiki.gonzaga.edu/tiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=163
- R160H HICA Chromatograph Excel File: http://crystal-wiki.gonzaga.edu/tiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=162
[[Labrum, Lee, & Bolinger, 3/4/13]]
*optimized R160H HICA Chromatograph: http://crystal-wiki.gonzaga.edu/tiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=201
[[Labrum, Lee, & Bolinger, 5/4/13]]
Summary Results
Proof of concept work (R160H)
Protein Variant | Elution Volume (mL) | Elution %B (imidazole concentration) | Yield in mg | total cell mass (g) | group member names |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECCA | 34.93 mL | 59% | 2.84 mg | 14.6 g | A. Labrum, D. Lee and I. Bolinger |
HICA R160H | 52.70 mL | 55.6% | 6.7 mg | 13.1 g | A. Labrum, D. Lee, and I. Bolinger |
HICA | 42.3 mL | 0% | 0 mg | 9.697 g | M. Konis, A. Blount |
HICA R160H | batch gradient | 100% | ? | ? | M. Konis, A. Blount |
General Method
Variant | elution volume | elution %B or mM imidazole | yield protein (mg) | total cell pellet (g) | group members |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T200H/S204H HICA | 127 mM imidazole | J. Birge | |||
M194H/T196H HICA | 10.3 mL | 105 mM imidazole | 18.3 mg | 5.60 g |
T. Singh, J. Nguyen |
M194H/T196H HICA | 90.4 mL | 100 mM imidazole | 13.9 mg | 6.61 g | J. Burr, N. Komlos |
T200H/S204H HICA | 9.03 mL | 105 mM imidazole | 0.0392 mg | 5.62 g |
J. Bauer, T. Heinrich |
T200H/S204H HICA | 12.1 mL | 122 mM imidazole | 10.2 mg | 4.08 g | H. Horney, R. Zagal |
Note
Elution volumn should be normalized to the beginning of the gradient, if possible, to account for differences in load volumes earlier in the run.
Elution volumn should be normalized to the beginning of the gradient, if possible, to account for differences in load volumes earlier in the run.